Lawyer-Bots Are Shaking Up Jobs (via MIT Technology Review)

December 17, 2017 clsadmin

The Pre-Session for the 2021 Edition of Bucerius Legal Tech Essentials – Regular Session begins on Monday May 3rd !

April 30, 2021April 30, 2021

Video from Our Law, Education and Experience (LEX) Short Talk at Stanford CodeX – Future Law 2021

April 29, 2021April 30, 2021

ARE YOU READY! The 2021 Edition of Bucerius Legal Tech Essentials

April 23, 2021April 23, 2021

Legal Complexity – Short Talk at Stanford CodeX Future Law ONLINE Conference 2021

April 9, 2021April 9, 2021

Problem Solving Experiments Reveal that People are More Likely to Consider Solutions that Add Features than Solutions that Remove Them (via Nature)

April 8, 2021April 8, 2021

DAKSH Centre of Excellence for Law and Technology at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

March 29, 2021March 29, 2021

Computational LegalFollow

Retweet on Twitter Computational Legal Retweeted

R. Amani @R_Amani·

29 Apr

Another #TShapedLawyer drop. Love to see more opportunities for lawyers and law students to build #TShaped skills like #BuceriusLegalTech! Thanks Dirk Hartung and @computational for a great intro session 💥

Reply on Twitter 1387836036311564289 Retweet on Twitter 13878360363115642899 Like on Twitter 138783603631156428924 Twitter 1387836036311564289

Retweet on Twitter Computational Legal Retweeted

Jean Marot @JeanMarot·

3 May

Very interesting first lecture by Pr Daniel Katz @computational about #AI and #Legalanalytics. Bucerius Legal TechEssentials 2021, an amazing initiative from @bucerius_law Dozens of other conferences in the coming days 🤩 #buceriuslegaltech

Reply on Twitter 1389310911752589318 Retweet on Twitter 13893109117525893181 Like on Twitter 13893109117525893184 Twitter 1389310911752589318

Retweet on Twitter Computational Legal Retweeted

ALIL-LATAM @AlilLatam·

3 May

En este momento, sigue la discusión con preguntas y respuestas sobre #IA y #Derecho en #BuceriusLegalTech @computational @sonofthefun @lauritzf

Reply on Twitter 1389285290435436544 Retweet on Twitter 13892852904354365441 Like on Twitter 13892852904354365443 Twitter 1389285290435436544

Retweet on Twitter Computational Legal Retweeted

ALIL-LATAM @AlilLatam·

3 May

A las 12:00 pm (US EST) la primera sesión oficial de #buceriuslegaltech 2021 sobre #InteligenciaArtificial y #Derecho expone Dan Martin Katz @computational @bucerius_law
#legaltech

Reply on Twitter 1389255245700616193 Retweet on Twitter 13892552457006161934 Like on Twitter 138925524570061619311 Twitter 1389255245700616193

Daniel Martin Katz, Ron Dolin & Michael Bommarito, Legal Informatics, Cambridge University Press (2021) (Edited Volume) < Cambridge >

Pierpaolo Vivo, Daniel Martin Katz & J.B. Ruhl (Editors), The Physics of the Law: Legal Systems Through the Prism of Complexity Science, Special Collection for Frontiers in Physics (2021 Forthcoming) < Frontiers in Physics >

Daniel Martin Katz, Legal Innovation (Book Forward) in Mapping Legal Innovation: Trends and Perspectives (Springer) (Antoine Masson & Gavin Robinson, eds.) (2021 Forthcoming) < Springer >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Eric Detterman, LexNLP: Natural Language Processing and Information Extraction For Legal and Regulatory Texts in Research Handbook on Big Data Law (Edward Elgar Press) (Roland Vogl, ed.) (2021 Forthcoming) < SSRN > < arXiv > < Github >

Daniel Martin Katz, Corinna Coupette, Janis Beckedorf & Dirk Hartung, Complex Societies and the Growth of the Law, 10 Scientific Reports 18737 (2020) < Nature Research >

Edward D. Lee, Daniel Martin Katz, Michael J. Bommarito II, Paul Ginsparg, Sensitivity of Collective Outcomes Identifies Pivotal Components, 17 Journal of the Royal Society Interface 167 (2020) < Journal of the Royal Society Interface >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Eric Detterman, OpenEDGAR: Open Source Software for SEC EDGAR Analysis, MIT Computational Law Report (2020) < MIT Law > < Github >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Mapping the Law with Artificial Intelligence in Law of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Machines (ABA Press) (2019) < ABA Press >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Harnessing the Complexity of Legal Systems for Governing Global Challenges in Global Challenges, Governance, and Complexity (Edward Elgar) (2019) < Edward Elgar >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Mapping Law’s Complexity with ‘Legal Maps’ in Complexity Theory and Law: Mapping an Emergent Jurisprudence (Taylor & Francis) (2018) < Taylor & Francis >

Michael Bommarito & Daniel Martin Katz, Measuring and Modeling the U.S. Regulatory Ecosystem, 168 Journal of Statistical Physics 1125 (2017) < J Stat Phys >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito & Josh Blackman, A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States, PLoS ONE 12(4): e0174698 (2017) < PLoS One >

J.B. Ruhl, Daniel Martin Katz & Michael Bommarito, Harnessing Legal Complexity, 355 Science 1377 (2017) < Science >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Legal Complexity, 101 Iowa Law Review 191 (2015) < SSRN >

Paul Lippe, Daniel Martin Katz & Dan Jackson, Legal by Design: A New Paradigm for Handling Complexity in Banking Regulation and Elsewhere in Law, 93 Oregon Law Review 831 (2015) < SSRN >

Paul Lippe, Jan Putnis, Daniel Martin Katz & Ian Hurst, How Smart Resolution Planning Can Help Banks Improve Profitability And Reduce Risk, Banking Perspective Quarterly (2015) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, The MIT School of Law? A Perspective on Legal Education in the 21st Century, Illinois Law Review 1431 (2014) < SSRN > < Slides >

Daniel Martin Katz & Michael Bommarito, Measuring the Complexity of the Law: The United States Code, 22 Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Law 1 (2014) < Springer > < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Quantitative Legal Prediction – or – How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Start Preparing for the Data Driven Future of the Legal Services Industry, 62 Emory Law Journal 909 (2013) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Joshua Gubler, Jon Zelner, Michael Bommarito, Eric Provins & Eitan Ingall, Reproduction of Hierarchy? A Social Network Analysis of the American Law Professoriate, 61 Journal of Legal Education 76 (2011) < SSRN >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Jillian Isaacs-See, An Empirical Survey of the Written Decisions of the United States Tax Court (1990-2008), 30 Virginia Tax Review 523 (2011) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito, Juile Seaman, Adam Candeub, Eugene Agichtein, Legal N-Grams? A Simple Approach to Track the Evolution of Legal Language in Proceedings of JURIX: The 24th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (2011) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz & Derek Stafford, Hustle and Flow: A Social Network Analysis of the American Federal Judiciary, 71 Ohio State Law Journal 457 (2010) < SSRN >

Michael Bommarito & Daniel Martin Katz, A Mathematical Approach to the Study of the United States Code, 389 Physica A 4195 (2010) < SSRN > < arXiv >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Jonathan Zelner, On the Stability of Community Detection Algorithms on Longitudinal Citation Data in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Applications of Social Network Analysis (2010) < SSRN > < arXiv >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz, Jonathan Zelner & James Fowler, Distance Measures for Dynamic Citation Networks 389 Physica A 4201 (2010) < SSRN > < arXiv >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Jonathan Zelner, Law as a Seamless Web? Comparing Various Network Representations of the United States Supreme Court Corpus (1791-2005) in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (2009) < SSRN >

Marvin Krislov & Daniel Martin Katz, Taking State Constitutions Seriously, 17 Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy 295 (2008) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Derek Stafford & Eric Provins, Social Architecture, Judicial Peer Effects and the ‘Evolution’ of the Law: Toward a Positive Theory of Judicial Social Structure, 23 Georgia State Law Review 975 (2008) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Institutional Rules, Strategic Behavior and the Legacy of Chief Justice William Rehnquist: Setting the Record Straight on Dickerson v. United States, 22 Journal of Law & Politics 303 (2006) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito, Tyler Sollinger & James Ming Chen, Law on the Market? Abnormal Stock Returns and Supreme Court Decision-Making < SSRN > < arXiv > < Slides >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito & Josh Blackman, Crowdsourcing Accurately and Robustly Predicts Supreme Court Decisions < SSRN > < arXiv > < Slides >

Daniel Martin Katz & Michael Bommarito, Regulatory Dynamics Revealed by the Securities Filings of Registered Companies < Slides >

Janis Beckedorf, Michael Bommarito, Corinna Coupette, Dirk Hartung & Daniel Martin Katz, Measuring the Scale & Complexity of the Regulatory State (Project In Progress)

You may like

The Pre-Session for the 2021 Edition of Bucerius Legal Tech Essentials – Regular Session begins on Monday May 3rd !

Video from Our Law, Education and Experience (LEX) Short Talk at Stanford CodeX – Future Law 2021

ARE YOU READY! The 2021 Edition of Bucerius Legal Tech Essentials

Legal Complexity – Short Talk at Stanford CodeX Future Law ONLINE Conference 2021

Problem Solving Experiments Reveal that People are More Likely to Consider Solutions that Add Features than Solutions that Remove Them (via Nature)

DAKSH Centre of Excellence for Law and Technology at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi