Scaling Trust – An Interview with John Hagel III

Legal NLP — Breaking the Legal Language Barrier ? Short Lex Talk at Future Law – Stanford CodeX Center for Legal Informatics

April 14, 2022April 14, 2022

Scenes from Yesterday’s FutureLaw Conference 2022 at Stanford CodeX

April 8, 2022April 9, 2022

Session on Computable Contracts in the Insurance Sector (PreMeeting for tomorrow’s FutureLaw Conference)

April 6, 2022April 9, 2022

Computational Legal Studies: Our Journey and Our Thoughts Circa 2022 – Keynote 3 at the CLS Conference – Singapore Management University

March 24, 2022March 24, 2022

Computational LegalFollow

Professor Daniel Martin Katz #Law + #Science + #Engineering + #Entrepreneurship BLOG: https://t.co/wAwPaZfB0i PAGE: https://t.co/4PK6hxIBFB ErdősNumber=4

Retweet on Twitter Computational Legal Retweeted

David Chalmers @davidchalmers42·

1 Feb

i've just uploaded a written version of my #NeurIPS2022 talk on "could a large language model be conscious?".
https://philpapers.org/rec/CHACAL-3

Reply on Twitter 1620792976548171776 Retweet on Twitter 1620792976548171776102 Like on Twitter 1620792976548171776372 Twitter 1620792976548171776

Retweet on Twitter Computational Legal Retweeted

Shayne Longpre @ShayneRedford·

1 Feb

✨New Paper✨What’s the best completely public competitor to #ChatGPT?

Flan-T5 beats all public models we tested:
Flan-T5 3B ▶️ T0++ 3B ▶️ OPT-IML 175B ▶️ GLM-130B ▶️ Flan 2021 3B ▶️ NIv2 3B

We release the @GoogleAI 🌟Flan Collection🌟data + methods for Instruction Tuning!

1/

Reply on Twitter 1620805305801261058 Retweet on Twitter 1620805305801261058226 Like on Twitter 16208053058012610581055 Twitter 1620805305801261058

Computational Legal @computational·

1 Feb

Many large companies maintain internal knowledge graphs to support a wide range of law/compliance tasks -even before we did our Bar Paper, we tested auto-processing ~50k sections of US Code through GPT and combined w/ SKOS/OWL artifacts

LINK🔬 🚀
https://tax-graph.273ventures.com/

Reply on Twitter 1620818770624413696 Retweet on Twitter 16208187706244136962 Like on Twitter 16208187706244136967 Twitter 1620818770624413696

Retweet on Twitter Computational Legal Retweeted

Michael Bommarito @mjbommar·

1 Feb

back in december, before we got "distracted" forcing poor GPT to take the bar exam, @computational and i first asked it (text-davinci-003) to read every single section (~50k) of the US Code...

Reply on Twitter 1620815272553910272 Retweet on Twitter 16208152725539102723 Like on Twitter 162081527255391027210 Twitter 1620815272553910272

Daniel Martin Katz, Ron Dolin & Michael Bommarito, Legal Informatics, Cambridge University Press (2021) (Edited Volume) < Cambridge >

Corinna Coupette, Janis Beckedorf, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, & Daniel Martin Katz, Measuring Law Over Time: A Network Analytical Framework with an Application to Statutes and Regulations in the United States and Germany, 9 Front. Phys. 658463 (2021) < Frontiers in Physics > < Supplemental Material >

Daniel Martin Katz, Legal Innovation (Book Forward) in Mapping Legal Innovation: Trends and Perspectives (Springer) (Antoine Masson & Gavin Robinson, eds.) (2021) < Springer >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Eric Detterman, LexNLP: Natural Language Processing and Information Extraction For Legal and Regulatory Texts in Research Handbook on Big Data Law (Edward Elgar Press) (Roland Vogl, ed.) (2021) < Edward Elgar > < Github > < SSRN > < arXiv >

Daniel Martin Katz, Corinna Coupette, Janis Beckedorf & Dirk Hartung, Complex Societies and the Growth of the Law, 10 Scientific Reports 18737 (2020) < Nature Research > < Supplemental Material >

Edward D. Lee, Daniel Martin Katz, Michael J. Bommarito II, Paul Ginsparg, Sensitivity of Collective Outcomes Identifies Pivotal Components, 17 Journal of the Royal Society Interface 167 (2020) < Journal of the Royal Society Interface > < Supplemental Material >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Eric Detterman, OpenEDGAR: Open Source Software for SEC EDGAR Analysis, MIT Computational Law Report (2020) < MIT Law > < Github >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Mapping the Law with Artificial Intelligence in Law of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Machines (ABA Press) (2019) < ABA Press >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Harnessing the Complexity of Legal Systems for Governing Global Challenges in Global Challenges, Governance, and Complexity (Edward Elgar) (2019) < Edward Elgar >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Mapping Law’s Complexity with ‘Legal Maps’ in Complexity Theory and Law: Mapping an Emergent Jurisprudence (Taylor & Francis) (2018) < Taylor & Francis >

Michael Bommarito & Daniel Martin Katz, Measuring and Modeling the U.S. Regulatory Ecosystem, 168 Journal of Statistical Physics 1125 (2017) < J Stat Phys >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito & Josh Blackman, A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States, PLoS ONE 12(4): e0174698 (2017) < PLoS One >

J.B. Ruhl, Daniel Martin Katz & Michael Bommarito, Harnessing Legal Complexity, 355 Science 1377 (2017) < Science >

J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz, Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Legal Complexity, 101 Iowa Law Review 191 (2015) < SSRN >

Paul Lippe, Daniel Martin Katz & Dan Jackson, Legal by Design: A New Paradigm for Handling Complexity in Banking Regulation and Elsewhere in Law, 93 Oregon Law Review 831 (2015) < SSRN >

Paul Lippe, Jan Putnis, Daniel Martin Katz & Ian Hurst, How Smart Resolution Planning Can Help Banks Improve Profitability And Reduce Risk, Banking Perspective Quarterly (2015) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, The MIT School of Law? A Perspective on Legal Education in the 21st Century, Illinois Law Review 1431 (2014) < SSRN > < Slides >

Daniel Martin Katz & Michael Bommarito, Measuring the Complexity of the Law: The United States Code, 22 Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Law 1 (2014) < Springer > < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Quantitative Legal Prediction – or – How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Start Preparing for the Data Driven Future of the Legal Services Industry, 62 Emory Law Journal 909 (2013) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Joshua Gubler, Jon Zelner, Michael Bommarito, Eric Provins & Eitan Ingall, Reproduction of Hierarchy? A Social Network Analysis of the American Law Professoriate, 61 Journal of Legal Education 76 (2011) < SSRN >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Jillian Isaacs-See, An Empirical Survey of the Written Decisions of the United States Tax Court (1990-2008), 30 Virginia Tax Review 523 (2011) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito, Juile Seaman, Adam Candeub, Eugene Agichtein, Legal N-Grams? A Simple Approach to Track the Evolution of Legal Language in Proceedings of JURIX: The 24th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (2011) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz & Derek Stafford, Hustle and Flow: A Social Network Analysis of the American Federal Judiciary, 71 Ohio State Law Journal 457 (2010) < SSRN >

Michael Bommarito & Daniel Martin Katz, A Mathematical Approach to the Study of the United States Code, 389 Physica A 4195 (2010) < SSRN > < arXiv >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Jonathan Zelner, On the Stability of Community Detection Algorithms on Longitudinal Citation Data in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Applications of Social Network Analysis (2010) < SSRN > < arXiv >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz, Jonathan Zelner & James Fowler, Distance Measures for Dynamic Citation Networks 389 Physica A 4201 (2010) < SSRN > < arXiv >

Michael Bommarito, Daniel Martin Katz & Jonathan Zelner, Law as a Seamless Web? Comparing Various Network Representations of the United States Supreme Court Corpus (1791-2005) in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (2009) < SSRN >

Marvin Krislov & Daniel Martin Katz, Taking State Constitutions Seriously, 17 Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy 295 (2008) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Derek Stafford & Eric Provins, Social Architecture, Judicial Peer Effects and the ‘Evolution’ of the Law: Toward a Positive Theory of Judicial Social Structure, 23 Georgia State Law Review 975 (2008) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Institutional Rules, Strategic Behavior and the Legacy of Chief Justice William Rehnquist: Setting the Record Straight on Dickerson v. United States, 22 Journal of Law & Politics 303 (2006) < SSRN >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito, Tyler Sollinger & James Ming Chen, Law on the Market? Abnormal Stock Returns and Supreme Court Decision-Making < SSRN > < arXiv > < Slides >

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito & Josh Blackman, Crowdsourcing Accurately and Robustly Predicts Supreme Court Decisions < SSRN > < arXiv > < Slides >

Daniel Martin Katz & Michael Bommarito, Regulatory Dynamics Revealed by the Securities Filings of Registered Companies < Slides >

Pierpaolo Vivo, Daniel Martin Katz & J.B. Ruhl (Editors), The Physics of the Law: Legal Systems Through the Prism of Complexity Science, Special Collection for Frontiers in Physics (2021 Forthcoming) < Frontiers in Physics >

Corinna Coupette, Dirk Hartung, Janis Beckedorf, Maximilian Bother & Daniel Martin Katz, Law Smells – Defining and Detecting Problematic Patterns in Legal Drafting < SSRN >

Ilias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, Ion Androutsopoulos, Daniel Martin Katz & Nikolaos Aletras, LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English < arXiv > < SSRN >

You may like

Daniel Katz — Jones Day Visiting Professor of Law at Singapore Management University

Bucerius Law School Summer Program Legal Technology and Operations 2022

Legal NLP — Breaking the Legal Language Barrier ? Short Lex Talk at Future Law – Stanford CodeX Center for Legal Informatics

Scenes from Yesterday’s FutureLaw Conference 2022 at Stanford CodeX

Session on Computable Contracts in the Insurance Sector (PreMeeting for tomorrow’s FutureLaw Conference)

Computational Legal Studies: Our Journey and Our Thoughts Circa 2022 – Keynote 3 at the CLS Conference – Singapore Management University