Tag Archives: computational legal studies

Declaration on Behalf of Carl Malamud / PublicResource.org Efforts to Seek a Fee Waiver for PACER (via law.resource.org)

I signed a declaration — Read more about it here!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Chicago Legal Innovation & Technology Meetup
(@Skadden in Chicago)

Thanks to everyone who joined us last night @Skadden for the Chicago Legal Innovation & Technology Meetup.  Our next meeting is at Chapman & Cutler in May with a series of additional events in the months to come …

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamacare’s Chances Of Survival Have Improved (But It Is Still Very Close)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Even The Algorithms Think Obamacare’s Survival Is A Tossup (via 538.com)

Today’s 538 coverage of the Supreme Court presents both our Supreme Court prediction algorithm (which we call {Marshall+}) and our crowd based platform called “Fantasy SCOTUS.” Both approaches point to a very close decision in the latest Obamacare case (i.e. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Daniel Martin Katz to Join IIT Chicago-Kent Faculty to Support Chicago Kent’s Ongoing Initiative to Build the Preeminent
Law & Technology Program in the Country

I am excited to announce that I am leaving MSU to join the Chicago-Kent College of Law where I have accepted a lateral offer starting this summer. It is has been a good run here at MSU Law and wish … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Quantitative Analysis of Trends in Writing Style on the U.S. Supreme Court ( via Carlson, Livermore & Rockmore )

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Measuring, Monitoring and Managing Legal Complexity
( J.B. Ruhl & Daniel Martin Katz )

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

LegalAnalyticsCourse.com — Now Online (but still in beta)

This intro class is designed to train students to efficiently manage, collect, explore, analyze, and communicate in a legal profession that is increasingly being driven by data. Our goal is to imbue our students with the capability to understand the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Legal Analytics – Introduction to the Course – Professors Daniel Martin Katz + Michael J Bommarito

Here is an introductory slide deck from “Legal Analytics” which is a course that Mike Bommarito and I are teaching this semester. Relevant legal applications include predictive coding in e-discovery (i.e. classification), early case assessment and overall case prediction, pricing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Legal by Design: A New Paradigm for Handling Complexity in Banking Regulation and Elsewhere in Law (Lippe, Katz & Jackson)

From SSRN abstract: “On August 5, 2014, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation criticized shortcomings in the Resolution Plans of the first Systematically Important Financial Institution (SIFI) filers. In his public statement, FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Constitute Project – The World’s Constitutions to Read, Search, and Compare

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Using R for Quantitative Methods for Lawyers and Legal Analytics Courses (Professors Katz + Bommarito)

While its performance is sometimes problematic for some extremely large data problems, R (with R studio frontend) is the data science language du jour for many small to medium data problems. Among other things, R is great because it is open … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why The Best Supreme Court Predictor In The World Is Some Random Guy In Queens (via 538.com)

Nice coverage of the research in this area and our multi year research agenda attached to forecasting using the three known streams of intelligence (experts, crowds & algorithms).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Katz + Bommarito Joining Forces for Joint Research Activities with CodeX – Stanford Center for Legal Informatics

While our primary home will remain here MSU Law, Mike Bommarito and I are excited to be joining up with the good folks at CodeX – Stanford Center for Legal Informatics. Based upon our shared interests, we plan to work … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Innovation and Emerging Legal Technology (Slides by Ron Dolin from Stanford Center on the Legal Profession)

This past Thursday Ron Dolin and I spole on a panel at the 19th Annual Thomson Reuters Legal Executive Institute Law Firm Leaders Forum. Above are Ron’s slides which many of you might find interesting. Below is a modified version … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Organizing the Chicago Legal Innovation and Technology Meetup – (First Meeting Nov. 19th @ 5:30pm)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Law is Code: A Software Engineering Approach to Analyzing the United States Code

William Li, Pablo Azar, David Larochelle, Phil Hill & Andrew Lo, Law is Code: A Software Engineering Approach to Analyzing the United States Code ABSTRACT:  “The agglomeration of rules and regulations over time has produced a body of legal code … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment