Monthly Archives: March 2009

Co-Sponsorship Networks– Senators of the 108th Congress

In the days and weeks to come we will turn our attenion away from Congress in favor of other institutions and substantive questions. However, given our prior posts focusing upon the structure of the 110th Congress, we thought it proper to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Senators of the 110th Congress Take 2-Contributions by Industry/Sector

To view the full image, please click here.   This represents a deeper cut on campaign contributions to the Senators of 110th Congress. Again, we rely upon data from the Center for Responsive Politics.  The CRP aggregates contribution data up … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Google for Government? Broad Representations of Large N DataSets

In our previous post, a post which has generated tremendous interest from a variety of sources, we demonstrated how applying the tools of network science can provide a broad representation for thousands of lines of information.  Throughout the 2008 Presidential Campaign … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Visualizing the Campaign Contributions to Senators in the 110th Congress — The TARP EDITION (The Image)

As part of our commitment to provide original content, we offer a Computational Legal Studies approach to the study of the current campaign finance environment.  If you click below you can zoom in and read the labels on the institutions … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Visualizing the Campaign Contributions to Senators in the 110th Congress — The TARP EDITION (Documentation for the Network)

  Visualizing the Campaign Contributions to the Senators of the 110th Congress — The TARP EDITION By Michael Bommarito & Daniel Katz University of Michigan Center for the Study of Complex Systems Department of Political Science BASIC OVERVIEW: 110th Congress … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Hustle & Flow: A Network Analysis of the American Federal Judiciary

This paper written by CLS Blog Co-Founder Daniel Katz and Derek Stafford from the University of Michigan Department of Political Science representes an initial foray into Computational Legal Studies by the graduate students here at the University of Michigan Center … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

When is the first term enough?: On approximation in social science

Research in the academic world suffers from the “hammer problem” – that is, the methods we use are often those that we have in our toolbox, not necessarily those that we should be using.  This is especially true in computational … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Print ‘Hello World’

In the days and weeks ahead, we hope to outline why we believe the application of a computational and complexity informed approach to legal studies will serve as a useful method to consider a wide class of substantive questions.  Standing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Computational Legal Studies

Welcome to the Computational Legal Studies blog!  We will be organizing behind the scenes in the short term, but check back soon for original content on the computational study of law and the application of complexity theory to legal scholarship. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment