<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Computational Legal Studies™</title>
	<atom:link href="http://computationallegalstudies.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winter 2012 &#8211; Quant Methods for Lawyers by LegalTech 2012 NYC &#8211; The Power of Data, Prediction and Tectonic Changes in the Business of Law &#124; &#124; Computational Legal Studies™Computational Legal Studies™</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/quant-methods-for-lawyers/#comment-3088</link>
		<dc:creator>LegalTech 2012 NYC &#8211; The Power of Data, Prediction and Tectonic Changes in the Business of Law &#124; &#124; Computational Legal Studies™Computational Legal Studies™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?page_id=7553#comment-3088</guid>
		<description>[...] Complex Systems CourseJLE Law Prof ArticleNetwork Analysis and Law TutorialVTR Tax Court ArticleWinter 2012 &#8211; Quant Methods for Lawyers        &#8592; Quantitative Methods for Lawyers Course &#8211; Access Syllabus, Full Course Slides, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Complex Systems CourseJLE Law Prof ArticleNetwork Analysis and Law TutorialVTR Tax Court ArticleWinter 2012 &#8211; Quant Methods for Lawyers        &larr; Quantitative Methods for Lawyers Course &#8211; Access Syllabus, Full Course Slides, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bursts: The Hidden Pattern Behind Everything We Do by Ashwin Kumar</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2010/04/17/bursts-the-hidden-pattern-behind-everything-we-do/#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=4032#comment-3067</guid>
		<description>Terribly interested in this new book. Always did feel there was a hidden pattern to the way my life hits it&#039;s peak &quot;busy times&quot; and the boring &quot;stasis times&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terribly interested in this new book. Always did feel there was a hidden pattern to the way my life hits it&#8217;s peak &#8220;busy times&#8221; and the boring &#8220;stasis times&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quantitative Methods for Lawyers Course &#8211; Access Syllabus, Full Course Slides, etc.  [ Prof. Daniel Katz - MSU Law - Winter 2012 ] by Richard Careaga</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2012/01/26/quantitative-analysis-for-lawyers-course-access-syllabus-full-course-slides-etc-prof-daniel-katz-msu-law-winter-2012/#comment-3053</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Careaga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=7626#comment-3053</guid>
		<description>On my first day of Contracts, a suitably long time ago, my professor informed us:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
If any of you could add, subtract, multiply or divide, you would be across campus at the business school.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

During my years at a Big Law firm as a transactional lawyer, I was repeatedly admonished: Neither shall thou calculate a number from any other number, although thou mayst proof it at the Printers, nor shall thou attempest to replicate any calculation prepared by another, for that is the sole charge of the accountants, who shall provide the holy Comfort.

This became somewhat awkward when dealing with transactions in which the distinction between a &lt;em&gt;million&lt;/em&gt; and a &lt;em&gt;billion&lt;/em&gt; had some very direct relevance.

Fortunately for my clients, I was a disobedient associate and I would surreptitiously calculate order of magnitude checks on numbers. To escape detection, I would do this in my head or in faint pencil lines that looked like list numbers.

The trick is the minimum one that students should come away with before getting into more esoteric topics.

Consider the proposition: &quot;The national debt is so large that our grandchildren&#039;s grandchildren will never be able to pay it off.&quot; Assume that the speaker is of an age to have grandchildren, say 50, and that the debt is $11 trillion dollars and that its principal balance will be unchanged, in constant dollars, when the speaker&#039;s grandchildren, now assumed to be infants have granchildren and those grandchildren, beginning 75 years from now,  will have a working life from age 25-65, or 40 years. Finally, assume that the average number of that cohort in the period 75-115 years from now is equal to 150 million.

How much per year will each of those future workers need to pay in principal to retire the debt? In your head.

1/1.5 is 2/3 or 0.666

1 trillion = 10^12
150 million = 1.5*10^8

12-8 = 4

10^4 = 10,000

10,000*.6666 = 6,666 or 6.6*10^3

40 = 4.0*10^1

6.66/4 is about equal to 1.5
3-1 is 2

1.5*10^ = $150

Backcheck: 150,000,000 workers times $150 per year times 40 years:

15*15*4  = 225*4 = 900

10^8 * 10^1 * 10^1 = 10^(8+1+1) = 10^10

900 = 9*10^2, so the result is 9* (10^(2+10) = 9 * 10^12, or 9 trillion, slightly low, should be 11 trillion. 

So, the answer is more than $150 per worker per year over their working lives, but something less than $200 per worker per year. Since the difference is a dollar a week, it is unimportant.

The ability to do &lt;strong&gt;that&lt;/strong&gt; should be on every state&#039;s bar exam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my first day of Contracts, a suitably long time ago, my professor informed us:</p>
<blockquote><p>
If any of you could add, subtract, multiply or divide, you would be across campus at the business school.
</p></blockquote>
<p>During my years at a Big Law firm as a transactional lawyer, I was repeatedly admonished: Neither shall thou calculate a number from any other number, although thou mayst proof it at the Printers, nor shall thou attempest to replicate any calculation prepared by another, for that is the sole charge of the accountants, who shall provide the holy Comfort.</p>
<p>This became somewhat awkward when dealing with transactions in which the distinction between a <em>million</em> and a <em>billion</em> had some very direct relevance.</p>
<p>Fortunately for my clients, I was a disobedient associate and I would surreptitiously calculate order of magnitude checks on numbers. To escape detection, I would do this in my head or in faint pencil lines that looked like list numbers.</p>
<p>The trick is the minimum one that students should come away with before getting into more esoteric topics.</p>
<p>Consider the proposition: &#8220;The national debt is so large that our grandchildren&#8217;s grandchildren will never be able to pay it off.&#8221; Assume that the speaker is of an age to have grandchildren, say 50, and that the debt is $11 trillion dollars and that its principal balance will be unchanged, in constant dollars, when the speaker&#8217;s grandchildren, now assumed to be infants have granchildren and those grandchildren, beginning 75 years from now,  will have a working life from age 25-65, or 40 years. Finally, assume that the average number of that cohort in the period 75-115 years from now is equal to 150 million.</p>
<p>How much per year will each of those future workers need to pay in principal to retire the debt? In your head.</p>
<p>1/1.5 is 2/3 or 0.666</p>
<p>1 trillion = 10^12<br />
150 million = 1.5*10^8</p>
<p>12-8 = 4</p>
<p>10^4 = 10,000</p>
<p>10,000*.6666 = 6,666 or 6.6*10^3</p>
<p>40 = 4.0*10^1</p>
<p>6.66/4 is about equal to 1.5<br />
3-1 is 2</p>
<p>1.5*10^ = $150</p>
<p>Backcheck: 150,000,000 workers times $150 per year times 40 years:</p>
<p>15*15*4  = 225*4 = 900</p>
<p>10^8 * 10^1 * 10^1 = 10^(8+1+1) = 10^10</p>
<p>900 = 9*10^2, so the result is 9* (10^(2+10) = 9 * 10^12, or 9 trillion, slightly low, should be 11 trillion. </p>
<p>So, the answer is more than $150 per worker per year over their working lives, but something less than $200 per worker per year. Since the difference is a dollar a week, it is unimportant.</p>
<p>The ability to do <strong>that</strong> should be on every state&#8217;s bar exam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winter 2012 &#8211; Quant Methods for Lawyers by Quantitative Analysis for Lawyers Course &#8211; Access Syllabus, Full Course Slides, etc. [ Prof. Daniel Katz - MSU Law - Winter 2012 ] &#124; Computational Legal Studies™</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/quant-methods-for-lawyers/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantitative Analysis for Lawyers Course &#8211; Access Syllabus, Full Course Slides, etc. [ Prof. Daniel Katz - MSU Law - Winter 2012 ] &#124; Computational Legal Studies™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?page_id=7553#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] Winter 2012 &#8211; Quant Methods for Lawyers [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Winter 2012 &#8211; Quant Methods for Lawyers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The MIT School of Law: A Perspective on Legal Education in the 21st Century [Presentation Slides Version 1.02] by Quora</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/10/13/the-mit-school-of-law-a-perspective-on-legal-education-in-the-21st-century-presentation-slides-version-1-01/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=6980#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What are some interesting examples of computing being used in law?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Yo Hareesh, Check out this presentation from Oct 2011 titled: &quot;The MIT School of Law: A Perspective on Legal Education in the 21st Century&quot; It&#039;s a pretty insightful 183 page deck on how the information revolution is transforming the field of law usi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What are some interesting examples of computing being used in law?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yo Hareesh, Check out this presentation from Oct 2011 titled: &#8220;The MIT School of Law: A Perspective on Legal Education in the 21st Century&#8221; It&#8217;s a pretty insightful 183 page deck on how the information revolution is transforming the field of law usi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clay Shirky: Why SOPA is a Bad Idea [via TED] by Enrique</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2012/01/19/clay-shirky-why-sopa-is-a-bad-idea-via-ted/#comment-3051</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=7589#comment-3051</guid>
		<description>Well said, I also recommend the following post by Julian Sanchez:

www.cato-at-liberty.org/internet-regulation-the-economics-of-piracy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, I also recommend the following post by Julian Sanchez:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/internet-regulation-the-economics-of-piracy" rel="nofollow">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/internet-regulation-the-economics-of-piracy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robert Trivers: Mathematical Approaches to Problems in Evolutionary Social Theory by Enrique</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/02/24/robert-trivers-mathematical-approaches-to-problems-in-evolutionary-social-theory/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=5607#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Trivers is a brilliant lecturer. I like his probabilistic approach to r (degree of relatedness).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trivers is a brilliant lecturer. I like his probabilistic approach to r (degree of relatedness).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing the Beta Pre-Release of Legal Language Explorer.com  &lt; Search the History of ANY Phrase in the Decisions of the United States Supreme Court &gt; by Kelly Martin</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/12/14/announcing-the-beta-pre-release-of-legal-language-explorer-com-search-the-history-of-any-phrase-in-the-decisions-of-the-united-states-supreme-court/#comment-2999</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=7355#comment-2999</guid>
		<description>Just a note: I&#039;ve done several searches on the site now without getting results I&#039;d expect.  &quot;Japanese&quot; only returned two cases, neither of which was Korematsu.  &quot;Substantive due process&quot; returned nothing at all and &quot;due process&quot; returned only a handful of cases.  Is your database fully populated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note: I&#8217;ve done several searches on the site now without getting results I&#8217;d expect.  &#8220;Japanese&#8221; only returned two cases, neither of which was Korematsu.  &#8220;Substantive due process&#8221; returned nothing at all and &#8220;due process&#8221; returned only a handful of cases.  Is your database fully populated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Legal Language Explorer &#8211; Presentation @ 24th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (Jurix 2011) by Legal Language Explorer &#171; Translation &#38; the law: From words to deeds</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/12/17/legal-language-explorer-presentation-24th-international-conference-on-legal-knowledge-and-information-systems-jurix-2011/#comment-3007</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal Language Explorer &#171; Translation &#38; the law: From words to deeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=7421#comment-3007</guid>
		<description>[...] here to see a presentation of the service, given at the conference JURIX 2011 in mid-December. Bommarito has also posted a more technical [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to see a presentation of the service, given at the conference JURIX 2011 in mid-December. Bommarito has also posted a more technical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Benoît B. Mandelbrot: Fractals in Science, Engineering and Finance (Roughness and Beauty) [via MIT World] by Fractals in Science, Engineering and Finance (Roughness and Beauty) &#171; Another Word For It</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/12/26/benoit-b-mandelbrot-fractals-in-science-engineering-and-finance-roughness-and-beauty-via-mit-world/#comment-3047</link>
		<dc:creator>Fractals in Science, Engineering and Finance (Roughness and Beauty) &#171; Another Word For It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=7460#comment-3047</guid>
		<description>[...] seen at: Benoît B. Mandelbrot: Fractals in Science, Engineering and Finance (Roughness and Beauty) over at Computational Legal [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seen at: Benoît B. Mandelbrot: Fractals in Science, Engineering and Finance (Roughness and Beauty) over at Computational Legal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing the Beta Pre-Release of Legal Language Explorer.com  &lt; Search the History of ANY Phrase in the Decisions of the United States Supreme Court &gt; by Barbara Phair</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/12/14/announcing-the-beta-pre-release-of-legal-language-explorer-com-search-the-history-of-any-phrase-in-the-decisions-of-the-united-states-supreme-court/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Phair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=7355#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>great concept, however, when I tried to do a search, nothing happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great concept, however, when I tried to do a search, nothing happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introduction to Computing for Complex Systems – Slides and Other Course Materials from ICPSR 2011 by Computational Legal Studies 2011 in Retrospective &#8211; Looking Forward to More in 2012 :) &#124; Computational Legal Studies™</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/11/18/introduction-to-computing-for-complex-systems-slides-and-other-course-materials-from-icpsr-2011/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>Computational Legal Studies 2011 in Retrospective &#8211; Looking Forward to More in 2012 :) &#124; Computational Legal Studies™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=6534#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>[...] Katz -ICPSR Summer Program 2011 &#8211; Full Course Slides for Computing for Complex Systems (20+ Cl... [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Katz -ICPSR Summer Program 2011 &#8211; Full Course Slides for Computing for Complex Systems (20+ Cl&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crime Maps: Interactive Exploration of Crime Stats [via The Guardian] by Computational Legal Studies 2011 in Retrospective &#8211; Looking Forward to More in 2012 :) &#124; Computational Legal Studies™</title>
		<link>http://computationallegalstudies.com/2011/02/20/crime-maps-interactive-exploration-of-crime-stats-via-the-guardian/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Computational Legal Studies 2011 in Retrospective &#8211; Looking Forward to More in 2012 :) &#124; Computational Legal Studies™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://computationallegalstudies.com/?p=5599#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>[...] Crime Maps: Interactive Exploration of Crime Stats [via The Guardian] [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Crime Maps: Interactive Exploration of Crime Stats [via The Guardian] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 348/362 objects using apc

Served from: computationallegalstudies.com @ 2012-02-04 06:40:37 -->
